Conclusion
Two Markets, Two Strategies
IHC in the US and UK are responding to a set of similar pressures including cost control, talent retention and reputational risk. American legal leaders are narrowing their focus to technology and performance optimisation to drive measurable outcomes. UK IHC, meanwhile, are balancing a broader set of priorities alongside technology, from ESG and compliance to client experience and profitability. These differences may reflect not just market conditions, but how legal teams are positioned within the wider business.
Yet across both jurisdictions, one theme is clear: IHC scope is expanding. Whether operating from New York, London or elsewhere in the two territories, legal leaders are called on for more than just advice — they’re expected to deliver impact. In response, in-house teams on both sides of the Atlantic are deploying legal data and rankings as part of their toolkit, albeit with slightly different approaches and emphasis.